• Skip to content

Mullooly Asset Management

Fee-Only Fiduciary Investment Advisor Financial Planner in Wall, NJ

Header Right

Find out what we can do for you! Call us: (732) 223-9000

Main navigation

  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Why Fee-Only?
    • Financial Planning – Our Process
    • Investment Management: Our Process
    • Our Fees
  • Blog
    • Asset Management
    • Financial Planning
    • News
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Contact

Fiduciary Obligation: Please Jump From Someone Else’s Window

February 26, 2013 by Thomas Mullooly

How does an investment advisor exercise his fiduciary obligation when the client wants more return, but does not want more risk?

A year ago I started working with a retired school teacher, 79 years old, with a $50,000 CD that had just matured at the bank. He reviewed his investments with me: plenty of bank investments, but very little experience in the stock market.

Part of my fiduciary obligation is to interview the new client. When the account was opened, the client said he was looking for more than he could make with the bank. We had a lengthy discussion about the level of risk he was willing to take, and what is appropriate given his age (79), and investment experience (in his words, risk-averse and limited experience).

Another fiduciary obligation is to discuss the game plan for the account. With his agreement, the account was invested in short term bond funds and other conservative investments, like utilities.

The account made money, but in our last discussion, he had a different idea: said he expected MORE.
Sometimes it may be best for an investment advisor who understands the fiduciary obligation he carries, let a client “commit financial suicide” by jumping out of someone else’s window… not yours.

This retired school teacher explained he “cannot survive” on a CD earning 0.25% and that’s why he turned to me. He said he read in the paper one of the major yardsticks for the market was up 8% in the past twelve months, why didn’t we make that kind of return? And then wanted to reinforce his point by adding, “you know there are seniors all across the country who are in the same predicament,” he said “we cannot live on a quarter of a point.”

He was right on his last point… simple math shows $50,000 would bring $125 in interest over one year, at 0.25%. But I seriously doubt most seniors leave the principal, withdraw “the precise amount” of earnings, and then try to live off that. But I understand the dramatic plea.

Financial Planning Must Be PrudentAs I did in our first meeting, again I explained the fiduciary obligation to my clients to make sure their money is invested not only in a suitable manner, but in a prudent manner. So, as I explained to this client, I won’t apologize this account was invested conservatively. I do not think it is prudent for a retired, 79 year old person (with very limited stock market experience) to take money from a bank account to begin buying and selling stocks, mutual funds or exchange-traded funds.

These are where problems can develop. An investor feels “forced” to do something out of character. In this case, this individual felt they had to move money out of “safe” investments and into “risky” investments to generate a return. But the likelihood was if they earned 8%, they would not have called up and asked for a check for the 8% gains. And if they had, what about taxes on the capital gains due if their instructions were followed and investments sold?

Further, suppose the investment advisor invested the money aggressively …and lost? Would it be prudent (in hindsight) for an investment advisor with a fiduciary obligation to take such risks?
It’s a mess.

It’s been mentioned elsewhere on our site: there are differences between investment advisers and employees at brokerage firms (stock brokers, financial consultants, etc). Brokerage firm employees work on a commission and are not held to the same level of fiduciary obligation. Brokers instead are held to simply a “suitability” standard. A “suitability” standard is a great concept. But investment advisers with a fiduciary obligation, making certain investments are prudent, seem to be a model more for our liking.

...And We Deliver!

Newsletter mailman

Get our updates delivered right to your inbox.
Sign up and get a copy of our report: The Eight Big Mistakes Many Investors Make.

Success! Now go and check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

We won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Powered by ConvertKit

Now Go Talk About It!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google+

Filed Under: Asset Management, Financial Planning Tagged With: fiduciary obligation

You might want to check these out...

Fiduciary Rule reaches a potential dead end
The Self-Fiduciary
Credit Freeze: Worth it?
Questions to Ask Before Working With a Financial Advisor
Fiduciary Rule Has Led to an Awakening

About Thomas Mullooly

Thomas Mullooly is owner and founder of Mullooly Asset Management, Inc. In 2002 Tom opened Mullooly Asset Management, a fee-only investment advisory firm. As an investment advisor, and not a broker, Tom works strictly for his clients. With the help of point and figure charting, Tom builds a realistic game plan for clients.

The information on this website and blog do not involve the rendering of personalized investment advice. A professional advisor should be consulted before implementing any of the options presented. No content should not be construed as legal or tax advice. Always consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation.
Copyright © 2002-2017 · Mullooly Asset Management
2052 Highway 35, Suite 203 · Wall Township, NJ 07719 · Tel: 732-223-9000
Copyright © 2002-2017
Mullooly Asset Management
2052 Highway 35, Suite 203
Wall Township, NJ 07719
Tel: 732-223-9000
  • About
  • Client Info
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclosures and Legal Disclaimers
  • Contact